Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0685 14
Original file (NR0685 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BC
Docket No: 00685-14

25 September 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
{(b) SECNAVINST 1910.48

Encl: .(1) DD Form 149-with attachments.
(2) HQMC MMSR-2 memo dtd 24Apr12
(3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 23Junl14
(4) HQOMC MMEA memo dtd 28Ju114
(5) Case summary
(6) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his
characterization of service (general) be upgraded to honorable,
that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be
upgraded, and the removal of six page 11’s (Administrative

- Remarks NAMVC 118(11)) from his record.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Exnicios, Mr. Green and Mr.

Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice

on 24 September 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,

determined that the partial corrective action indicated below

should be taken on the available evidence of record.

. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the

- enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

3.. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Petitioner reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 5
January 2010. He was convicted by a summary court-martial (SCM)
of conspiring to commit larceny of military property valued at.
$8,252, conspiring to commit larceny with a fellow Marine,
failure to obey a lawful general regulation, theft of military
property valued at $8,252 and wrongfully soliciting a fellow
Marine. His sentence is not documented in his record, but he
was authorized to complete his enlistment. He received six page
11 counseling entries in light’ of his SCM conviction in which he
was not recommended for, promotion. He received a general
characterization of service upon his release from active duty
with an RE-4 reentry code on 13 April 2012, wpon his transfer to
the Marine Corps Reserve.

b. Enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from. the
Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Separation and Retirement
Branch (MMSR-2) recommending that Petitioner’s general
characterization of service be changed to honorable because his
proficiency/conduct mark averages were sufficiently high.

c. Enclosure (3) is an advisory opinion from the HQMC
Manpower Information Assurance, Manpower Information System
Division (MIQ) commenting to the effect that Petitioner’s
request to remove all six page 11 entries has merit because they
‘are not procedurally correct.

ad. Enclosure (4) is an advisory opinion from the HOMC
Enlisted Assignment Branch (MMEA) recommending that Petitioner's
RE-4 reentry code not be changed because his SCM conviction
makes him ineligible for reenlistment.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants partial
favorable action.

The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of
service and the favorable advisory opinion from MMSR-2, that
partial relief in the form of upgrading his general discharge to
honorable is warranted. The Board further concludes that based

oon the favorable recommendation from MIQ, that all six ‘page 11

 

‘entries be removed. « However, the Board agrees with the
unfavorable recommendation from MMEA that in light of his SCM
conviction, his RE-4 reentry code should not be changed. in
view of the above, the Board directs the following limited
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION ::

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that.
he received an honorable discharge on 13 April 2012.

b. That Petitioner’s naval record be further corrected by
removing six page 11 entries in which he received counseling and
was not recommended. for promotion dated 1 July 2010, 15
September 2010, 15 December 2010, 15 March 2011, 15 June 2011
and one undated, from his record.

c. That no further relief be granted.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

  

ROBERT J. O'NETUL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14

    Original file (NR4745 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13

    Original file (NR0593 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0271 14

    Original file (NR0271 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding the nonjudicial punishment (NUP) imposed on 27 April 2010 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). e. Enclosure (4), an advisory opinion from HOMC Military Justice Branch, Judge Advocate Division (JAM) regarding Petitioner's request to remove the NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02280 12

    Original file (02280 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2009, a copy of which is at Tab A. That his record be corrected further to restore his AMOS of 8411. c. That his record be corrected further to show his entitlement to SDA pay for 21 July 2010 to 13 June...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14

    Original file (NR5272 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13

    Original file (NR3524 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8365 13

    Original file (NR8365 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding. e. An AO received from the HQOMC Military Justice Branch, Judge Advocate Division (JAM), enclosure (5), regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NJP, page 11, and all related references thereto, recommended relief be granted because he self-reported that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03944-12

    Original file (03944-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Gattis and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 11 February 9011. c. That any material or entries inconsistent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13

    Original file (NR8518-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...